September 20, 2026·
post
Variable Incentive as a Performance Modifier
Variable Incentive as a Performance Modifier
One of the common failures of an incentive system is when good behaviour isn't meaningfully rewarded and poor behaviour isn't meaningfully penalised.
When the difference between mediocre and exceptional performance has little consequence, mediocrity becomes an easy place to gravitate to.
A variable incentive can sit on top of a relatively fixed product and modify how that product gets delivered.
This is particularly useful when quality is subjective, such as a smile or lifting your luggage, and cannot be completely captured by an objective metric such as reaching on time or service duration.
A variable incentive gives you an additional lever:
+X is the premium you pay to someone for putting in the effort to give you a better experience.
If that behaviour becomes consistent, +X becomes the baseline against which future performance is measured. This creates a behavioural loop: Good work → recognised → repeated behaviour.
The mechanism:
+X → Premium service
+2X → Exceptional effort
0X → Below-standard performance
This is different from segmentation, where the product or service is deliberately delivered differently to different customers, such as FF tiers or HNI banking.
Here, the base product remains the same. The incentive changes the behaviour of the people delivering it.
You can also reinforce good behaviour through culture, where people start measuring themselves against the behaviour of others. But getting culture right, and maintaining it consistently at scale, is difficult if not downright impossible.
An incentive can therefore act as a more direct, individual-level mechanism for employees, partners, or service providers, rather than an external mechanism for segmenting customers.
Take a haircut, for example.
The outlet and its price point establish the baseline product. If the service is rushed or below standard, I tip 0X. If the barber consistently puts in more effort, +X becomes the norm. Once that quality becomes predictable, an occasional +2X recognises exceptional effort.
The system then has room in both directions:
0X signals that the baseline wasn't met.
+X reinforces premium service and establishes the desired baseline.
+2X creates a visible, tangible upside for going above and beyond.
You don't start by paying +2X. First, use +X to see whether the incentive actually changes behaviour.
And 0X isn't necessarily a punishment. You're still paying the full price. It's feedback, communicated subtly.
When people are part of the product experience, the incentive system needs to become part of the product itself.
P.S. After writing this, it occurred to me that someone would probably gamify the whole thing: leaderboards, top performer prizes, R&R programmes, certificates, virtual badges (Uber). But those don't move jackshit.
Have a thought or correction? Reach out on LinkedIn.
Get new notes by email
No noise — just new notes as they land.